Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 8,633
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2011, 11:30 pm
For example, R. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
., v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:09 pm
For example, Jordan v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:21 pm
Moran (UCLA) The End of Marriage Tucker Culbertson (Syracuse) Afterword Peter Wallenstein (VCU) [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:14 pm
Newton v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:30 pm
ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:11 am
As a friend and fellow-blogger, Peter Groves can expect a kind review from the IPKat. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:01 am
Peter’s Univ. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:40 am
Bagli and DealBook's Peter Lattman. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:35 am
" Cobbs v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:09 pm
This issue is absolutely dripping with good content, including the IPKat's pick of the month, Peter J. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am
-China intellectual property debate / Peter K. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:20 am
Though this practice has been very common during jury selection, in its 1995 ruling, State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
No. 337-TA-755) (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright US provides misleading answer to WIPO questionnaire on export of accessible works under US law (Knowledge Ecology International) US Copyright – Decisions Court of Appeals 11th Circuit: Saregama’s lack of standing to sue: Saregama India Ltd v Timothy Mosley (Spicy IP) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Kanye West wins copyright battle – N D Illinois grants motion to dismiss infringement complaint in Vincent… [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm
Peter Stewart v The Queen (Jamaica), heard 28 March 2011. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 7:44 am
Peter Lu of the Hartford Advocate discusses the Court’s decision in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
In its April 6 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
