Search for: "Powers v. Powers" Results 6441 - 6460 of 55,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 am by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
For the purpose of this Order the respondents’ assets include any asset which they have power, directly or indirectly, to dispose of, or deal with as if it were their own. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 8:02 am by David Cheifetz
Disclosure: a speaker, yesterday, at a lecture I attended used the Henry 2 v Henry 8 line to describe the possible results, saying that, of course, the decision wouldn’t be put quite that way. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:01 pm
The comment thread in my post on next week's oral argument in Virginia v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
It further stated that the court had already held activities which, like national defence, fell within the exercise of public powers were in principle excluded from classification as economic activity. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, the government’s power to “impos[e] conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms,” D.C. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
A third argument involves Congressional powers. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am by Alice Himsworth, Olswang.
The law The issue of whether a claimant with an otherwise valid claim who substantially exaggerates that claim should lose their right to damages was considered by the Court of Appeal in the cases of Shah v Ul-Haq (2009) and Widlake v BAA Ltd (2009). [read post]