Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 6441 - 6460
of 51,502
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 1:41 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:05 pm
Ct. 1740 (2011), and Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 8:07 am
v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 7:36 am
” Chanel, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 6:49 am
Instead, the task of filling this vacuum fell entirely to the Supreme Court, which began that effort with the most famous footnote in the law - Footnote Four of United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 5:49 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
12 May 2016, 12:45 pm
In Owens v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm
In a seminal case in North Carolina, Hinkamp v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Armour v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
It is certainly a long-standing rule, dating at least to State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:19 am
Smith v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Alternatively, Dobbs, Bruen, and West Virginia v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 10:34 am
From Judge Ryan Nelson's opinion this morning in Jones v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
The number 12 has long been associated with trial by jury but apparently no one knows precisely why the number of 12 jurors was adopted. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:17 am
Sparks v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 4:17 am
Sparks v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 7:13 am
--Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh CircuitOpinion Date: 8/27/10Cite: Gross v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:43 am
On June 18, 2012, in Christopher, et. al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:00 am
On August 18, 2023, the Fifth Circuit sitting en banc in Hamilton v. [read post]
