Search for: "State v. Long." Results 6441 - 6460 of 51,502
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2022, 2:00 am by Rose Hughes
Further reading Reference to a hybridoma does not limit a product-by-process antibody claim (T 0032/17) Strict US written description requirement applied to CAR-T-cell therapy (Juno v Kite) Patenting Antibodies: The epitope claim is dead, long live the epitope claim [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 8:00 am by INFORRM
On 31 March 2022, £50,000 in damages was awarded and an injunction granted to the claimant in Sadik v Sadik [2019] EWHC 2717 (QB). 5RB’s commentary on the judgment’s conclusions on the interaction between s.9 Defamation Act 2013 and CPR r.11 is that it would be unusual for defendants to keep a jurisdiction challenge up their sleeves for as long as they choose, as this could result in huge costs wasted in English courts and limitation problems in alternative… [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 1:05 am by Rose Hughes
Applicants are required either to delete subject matter no longer covered by the claims or explicitly state that the offending subject matter does not fall under the scope of the invention. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently though, the Court stated in 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
  And a final example is provided by Article V of the United States Constitution. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 9:57 am by Larry
This comes from SGS Sports Inc. v. [read post]