Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
The challenge was based on the United States Supreme Court's 2010 case New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm
Choice, v.50, no. 06, February 2013. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 2:23 pm
As a North American purebred (with some distinctive Quebec markings), this Kat's morsels will focus primarily on the fun and foibles of the United States IP system -- starting with a colossal copy-fight brewing over the future of television. [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 4:08 pm
Some of the background can be found in an article entitled “Right of Reply: A Comparative Approach” [pdf] by Andras Koltay, who also discusses the position in the United States and Canada. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:30 am
Mumaugh The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued the long anticipated ruling in the Noel Canning v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:22 am
The United States Supreme Court, in cases such as Press-Enterprise Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 3:28 pm
Related posts:Federal Circuit on Software Patents: Show Me the AlgorithmsEarlier today the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Noah Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Alan Scott Rau is the Mark G. and Judy G. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
United States, 12-6355, concerning the proper application of the categorical analysis in Shepard v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
That means under the United States Code, there are no accepted medical uses. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 1:04 pm
Department of Justice v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:30 pm
United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
There, the question was whether the logo was an official insignia falling with Section 2(b), i.e., was it “of the same class as the flag or coats of arms of the United States. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:13 pm
Thanks to Judge Dow’s United Parcel Service decision, those days are about over. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:55 am
United States, which is currently pending appeal. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am
Swarovski sued Building #19 and managed to obtain a preliminary injunction.Crystal figurine by... oh, wait.Yes, indeed: Swarovski persuaded a United States district court judge to prohibit Building #19 from using the word Swarovski in an ad that stated, truthfully, that the company was selling Swarovski crystal collectibles. [read post]
