Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 6441 - 6460
of 6,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2008, 2:21 pm
Indiana (involving the constitutionality of voter ID laws). [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 5:07 am
Marion County Election Board, which could affect the 2008 election directly by either upholding or striking down voter identification laws -- laws that critics say will suppress Democratic voter turnout.Then in March the high court takes up District of Columbia v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 4:00 pm
Rokita (07-25), asking whether Indiana’s law requiring voters to show ID at polling places violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and in Kentucky Retirement Systems v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 11:33 am
So, old v. young? [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The second time came a few minutes later when Clinton said: "The there [sic] are two big questions for voters in New Hampshire. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 8:07 am
Both cases involve the constitutionality of Indiana's voter-id law that requires in-person... [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 5:37 am
The case, Crawford v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 8:58 am
Among others was the landmark 1986 ruling Batson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:11 pm
Powell, the swing voter in the Bowers v. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 8:19 am
The Supreme Court held in Pabey v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 12:56 pm
The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the "most politically divisive case since Bush v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 5:58 am
Robert Barnes writes in a lengthy report:The Supreme Court will open the new year with its most politically divisive case since Bush v. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 9:32 am
In Shuler v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 12:03 pm
Burke v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:41 am
Case Name: Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:41 am
Case Name: Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:33 am
The focus is on the Supreme Court's recent decision in LULAC v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 8:42 pm
The AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project will have this interesting event on January 7, two days before oral argument in Crawford.... [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:27 am
This could revive the equal protection claims that were made in the Stewart v. [read post]
13 Dec 2007, 6:12 am
Tashjian v. [read post]
