Search for: "W. D."
Results 6441 - 6460
of 13,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2014, 10:01 pm
Michael Parnell’s attorneys — Edward D. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
” Peter W. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:41 pm
She'd broached the topic of her possible nonexistence: "I became convinced that I had died and no one was telling me. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
I’d like to begin my commentary on that case by offering a very general comment. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:49 am
” Fourth, and finally, the Court did not even undertake to demonstrate its new standard by application to the facts before the Court; rather, “mindful that we are a court of review, not of first view,” the Court “decline[d] to apply the standard we have announced to the controversy” before it. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:08 pm
(W. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:33 pm
THE CITY OF FLAGLER BEACH, etc., Appellee. 5th District.Jurisdiction -- Non-residents -- Fraudulent transfers -- Trial court improperly denied motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction a complaint filed against defendant, an out-of-state resident, under Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act, because a fraudulent transfer is not a tortious act for the purposes of Florida's long-arm statute, and additionally because plaintiff failed to specify where the alleged fraudulent transfer occurred… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:26 pm
According to the Court, as a matter of “common-sense interpretation,” the “project propose[d] the “installation” of the utility cabinets for purposes of clause [2] of the Class 3 exemption. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 1:54 pm
No. 12-1065-RGA (D. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:09 am
This morning, the House rejected a bid from Jim Moran (D–Md.) to allow for the transfer of GTMO detainees to the United States. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:00 am
In 1999, Doherty J.A. of the Ontario Court of Appeal tried to rebrand “Solicitor-Client Privilege” as “Client-Solicitor Privilege”.[10] It didn’t take; we still put the Solicitor first despite the client’s interests being the raison d’être for the privilege. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm
Se trataba de John W. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:01 pm
— Liam Brown (@liamjmbrown) May 26, 2014 @liamjmbrown I’d be plsd to wk w @ronfriedmann on this #NewLaw, Legal Tech, Inhouse Outside Counsel | Ron let’s take it offline to email? [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:04 am
In April 2008, D&Y hired lawyer Andrea Calvaruso as a non-equity or “contract” partner pursuant to a written agreement that allowed her to hold herself out to the world as a ”partner” but expressly classified her as a W-2 employee for tax purposes with fixed salary and bonus. [read post]
24 May 2014, 8:22 am
Brennwald Bryan W. [read post]
23 May 2014, 7:19 am
On the federal level, you might be in violation of 26 USC §7204 which prohibits the willful furnishing of a withholding statement under 26 USC §6051 (i.e., Forms W-2 and W-3) that is false or fraudulent. [read post]
23 May 2014, 4:54 am
Gile went on to state that `Bernstein–Rein’ and `the Rein name’ were respected because `the truth within the family ha[d] not been revealed. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
Donald and Rochelle Sterling, the LA Clippers, Racism, and California Family Law: An Outsider's Brief Legal Analysis By: Michael C. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:22 am
Specifically, the question the Justices will consider in this case is: “[W]hether certain statutory protections codified at 5 U.S.C. 2302(b)(8)(A), which are inapplicable when an employee makes a disclosure “specifically prohibited by law,” can bar an agency from taking an enforcement action against an employee who intentionally discloses Sensitive Security Information. [read post]
20 May 2014, 7:34 pm
Accompanying this rule is a Final Statement of Reasons that, on page 9, contains a striking exchange: In response to Robert W. [read post]
