Search for: "Lee v. LEE" Results 6461 - 6480 of 7,968
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2010, 2:25 am by traceydennis
Regina v Lee [2010] EWCA Crim 1404; [2010] WLR (D) 160 “The offence under s 85(5)(b) of the Medicines Act 1968 of selling or supplying a medicinal product which was misleadingly labelled or marked in respect of the nature or quality of the product, where such sale or supply was done by a person ‘in the course of a business carried on by him’, could not be committed by a person who was merely employed or engaged by the business which carried out the sale or supply,… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:43 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Chrysostomou, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1403 (24 June 2010) Attorney Generals Reference No 114 – 115 of 2009 [2010] EWCA Crim 1459 (24 June 2010) Lee, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1404 (24 June 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) K, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1528 (Admin) (24 June 2010) HM (Malawi), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:43 pm by cdw
In the lower courts several favor decisions are noted including Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm by cdw
” Ronnie Lee Gardner v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:35 am by Kent Scheidegger
Mississippi, 379 U.S. 443 (1965), was blasted in Justice Kennedy's dissent in Lee v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:36 am by James Bickford
”  Carol Lee of Politico and the Associated Press (via CBS News) report on Sen. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 6:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals blog identifies two examples of this phenomenon from published opinions released in March:PD-0307-09, Ronald Lee Wilson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 11:16 am by Josh
The lawsuit at the center of the film is based on Jenson v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:40 am by Matthew Scarola
The Court also yesterday denied Ronnie Lee Gardner’s stay of execution request. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 10:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
In the middle one, Justices Stevens and Breyer dissent with reference to their dissent in Johnson v. [read post]