Search for: "People v J."
Results 6461 - 6480
of 7,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2009, 8:52 am
In R. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 6:50 am
The case in question is Kelly and Chiu v GE Healthcare Ltd [2009] EWHC 181 (Pat), a ruling of Mr Justice Floyd.Right: till Floyd J gave his judgment, Amersham for most people was just a sleepy town in BuckinghamshireHaving established that the invention they made was worth £50 million to Amersham International (subsequently taken over by GE), the judge held that Kelly was entitled to £1 million, and Chiu to £500,000, for the value of the inventive… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:14 am
People v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:01 pm
R. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 6:21 pm
173 John Dawson and George Szmukler 8 A Stable Paradigm: Revisiting Capacity, Vulnerability and the Rights Claims of Adolescents after v. 183 Catherine J. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:16 am
People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 2:45 pm
Doe v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
" Illinois: People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:43 pm
Attorney Benton J. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 12:42 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:36 pm
Galen J. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 12:04 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:37 pm
Doe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:58 pm
Warwick Rothnie considers Elwood v Cotton On and asks is copying enough to infringe Down Under?. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:18 am
United States, 333 U.S. 10, 13-14 (1948) (Jackson, J.). [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
I accept the formulation of Ouseley J in O’Brien v Basildon District Council [2007] 1 P&CR 16. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
I accept the formulation of Ouseley J in O’Brien v Basildon District Council [2007] 1 P&CR 16. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
Biological Paternity Isn't Determinative - Cornelio v. [read post]
