Search for: "Plaintiff(s)" Results 6461 - 6480 of 178,471
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2023, 10:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals finds that plaintiff may have suffered a due process violation. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:36 am by Kenan Farrell
The Court had apparently used ambiguous language regarding the plaintiffs priority rights to its trademark. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 8:02 am by David Judd
One such circumstance is when the cause of action is not known or reasonably knowable to the plaintiff, even though the plaintiffs ignorance is not induced by the defendant. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 7:37 am by ESTHER NEVILLE CASTRO
One of the most important reasons for its use is to safeguard one’s privacy and security. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 7:32 am by Eugene Volokh
"'To state a cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, a plaintiff must allege (1) a reasonable expectancy of entering into a valid business relationship, (2) the defendant's knowledge of the expectancy, (3) an intentional and unjustified interference by the defendant that induced or caused a breach or termination of the expectancy, and (4) damage to the plaintiff resulting from the defendant's… [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 6:18 am by Sidney Schupak, Esq.
Most states still bar plaintiffs from recovering damages if their share of fault is over 50% or 51% depending on the state’s laws. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 6:01 am by Mary T. Costigan and Robert Yang
In a recent case in California district court, the plaintiff brought claims under the CCPA’s reasonable security safeguards requirement for the defendant’s alleged sharing of consumer data. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:53 am by Searcy Law
The Plaintiff will typically claim that the property owner or manager is entirely responsible for any slip and fall that occurs on their premises. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:53 am by Searcy Law
The Plaintiff will typically claim that the property owner or manager is entirely responsible for any slip and fall that occurs on their premises. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:53 am by Searcy Law
The Plaintiff will typically claim that the property owner or manager is entirely responsible for any slip and fall that occurs on their premises. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:45 am by Bernard Clark
In this scenario, if the plaintiff was found to be 10% at fault and the other driver was 90% at fault, the plaintiffs compensation award would be reduced by 10%. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But in any event I think it's important to remember just how commonplace these issues are. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 4:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Later, in February 2019, another employee complained about the plaintiffs alleged harasser. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 5:36 pm by Steve Bainbridge
" As for the latter, the estimable Kevin LaCroix has written that: A claim alleging a board’s breach of duty of oversight has long been regarded as one of the most difficult for a plaintiff to sustain. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 5:08 pm by Howard Friedman
The court held that the state's Insurance Code is a neutral, generally applicable statute, saying in part:Individual Plaintiffs argue that the Superintendent’s March 26, 2020, press release, --- which cautions consumers about HCSMs and stating that these plans are unauthorized insurance products—is not neutral because it “sends a signal of official disapproval” of Individual Plaintiffs’ religious beliefs.... [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The appeal was dismissed, the plaintiff failed to establish that the harm resulting from the expressions outweighs the harmful effects on freedom of expression [78]. [read post]
However, Giuliani did receive some respite in the delay of the plaintiffs request for payment of attorney’s fees. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 8:41 am by Hollis Wright
by HWC Partner Carter Clay For any attorney who has pursued product liability cases on behalf of injured victims, you know that the attorney(s) for the manufacturer will often claim that the plaintiff “misused” the product and that it was the plaintiff who caused the incident. [read post]
Morris also noted that 359’s legislative history provided “substantial evidence” that an “impermissible purpose” was behind 359’s enactment. [read post]