Search for: "United States v. Minor" Results 6461 - 6480 of 7,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 11:45 am by John Akin (US) and Selina Coleman (US)
The United States appeared as amicus curiae in support of the relators, and was given separate time to present its views. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by WIMS
And they'd be especially devastating for states like Kentucky and other coal states. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The district court in California adopted a special master’s report and recommendation with one minor modification (Guerrero v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 3:45 pm by Eugene Volokh
" However, "that right is limited by the State's compelling interest in protecting the welfare of children. [read post]
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard):  On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
First, there is a risk to taking Crestor because there are reported side effects that range from minor discomfort to catastrophic illness and death. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 3:15 am by Andres
Analysis Football DataCo v Yahoo! [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:32 am by Greg Mersol
  At  the time the suit was filed, the Ninth Circuit authority was unfavorable to their enforcement, but by the approval hearing the United States Supreme Court had rendered its decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:41 pm
   The complaint was filed in the face of many decisions of federal courts in the United States holding that a non-commercial "gripe" site about a trademark holder may use a domain name in the form www.trademark.com so long as the site itself is not confusing about whether it is sponsored by the trademark holder. [read post]