Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 6481 - 6500 of 13,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2007, 11:17 am
Gerber's employment as a conservation officer with the DNR. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:34 am by Big Tent Democrat
Article V, Section 3 of the Florida Constitution provides that: [The Supreme Court . . . m]ay issue writs of mandamus and quo warranto to state officers and state agencies. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
Any consequential administrative inconvenience was to for Parliament to remedy. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:58 am by Fabrizio di Piazza
 Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:57 am by Contributor
On July 20, the Superior Court of Justice released its newsworthy decision in Morris v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:04 pm by D. Daxton White
On September 20, 2011, Fleishman was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Sections 371 and 1349, before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 2:04 pm by D. Daxton White
On September 20, 2011, Fleishman was convicted of one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of Title 18 United States Code, Sections 371 and 1349, before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by Conor McEvily
Cain, the Court held that the failure of prosecutors in the New Orleans district attorney’s office to fulfill their constitutional duty (under the 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:11 am
Authority to initiate disciplinary action against an employeeMatter of Stafford v Board of Educ. of Mohonasen Cent. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
” The court also heard argument yesterday in Peter v. [read post]