Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
Code, § 720(a); see also Daubert v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am
It is easy for lawyers--in the United States and other legal cultures descended from the English common-law system--to forget that this need not be the case: in civil law systems, court decisions do not create binding precedents! [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:57 am
For example, similar rights already existed under English law as a result of s13 DPA 1998 (which afforded data subjects a right to bring direct claims against a data controller for losses caused by a breach of DPA 1998)—this right was interpreted broadly by the English courts as including a right to compensation for non-pecuniary losses of the type contemplated by GDPR (see Vidal-Hall v Google). [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 11:28 am
Vallee rendered judgment in Nakhuda v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 11:22 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 7:33 am
” (Jung, 1964, pp. 20–21) Since the 12th century, and within its construction in Germanic languages including English, trust was understood as a relational concept (Etymology Online, n.d.). [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
When he was eventually sent to a Catholic school, he had to learn to read and write in English. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
” Jones v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:17 am
Neuberger takes a traditional English constitutional line on this issue. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 4:57 pm
Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers Ltd [1993] UKHL 18 established that the government cannot sue for libel. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 6:04 am
Norwitz, Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:17 pm
Such was the case on Wednesday in Gelboim v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Walker, Jr., op. cit., citing Payne v. [read post]
In Advance of April 1 Effective Date, DOL Issues Guidance on Families First Coronavirus Response Act
26 Mar 2020, 10:49 am
The DOL stated additional guidance on the small business exemption would be forthcoming. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:50 pm
United States (transcript) before SCOTUS. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:15 am
The House of Lords ruled in 2005 in the case of A & Ors v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:12 pm
In ACLU v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 4:55 am
The state wanted to give 1 percent annual raises for five years to the teachers — who make less than those in all but three states — and have them pay more for health insurance. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
See, e.g., Vance v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:57 am
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
