Search for: "Herring v. State" Results 6481 - 6500 of 58,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2014, 9:26 am by Dave Maass
Tallman) at the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
A key element of the prosecution case was evidence from a forensic video analyst, who stated that CCTV footage from the night of her disappearance showed Kamila carrying her favourite handbag. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:42 am by Eric Citron
  But that seemed to play into Justice Kagan’s hand, who made clear that this was her point – that in understanding this text, the context obviously mattered. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 12:17 am
 Our prayers go out to her family and to all those that worked with her at the State Attorney's Office. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 3:42 pm by Anthony Zaller
This statute authorizes an employee to bring an action for civil penalties on behalf of the state against his or her employer for Labor Code violations committed against the employee and fellow employees, with most of the proceeds of that litigation going to the state. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Extradition shall not be granted in any of the following circumstances: 1. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 3:55 am
Stated another way, the appointing authority has until the last day of the individual's probationary period to decide whether to retain the employee, extend the employee's probationary period, or to terminate the employee from his or her position. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Justice Ginsburg kept that brief close at hand, including as she wrote the Supreme Court’s 1996 landmark gender equality decision, United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:42 pm
Her dissent, in toto, reads as follows: "While I understand joining the parade of courts to decide this issue, I would reverse for the reasons stated in Muniz v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
United Parcel Service, in which a Virginia woman alleges that the shipping company violated the Pregnancy Discrimination Act when it failed to give her “light duty” during her pregnancy. [read post]