Search for: "People v Long"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 18,894
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2017, 10:50 pm
These are always interesting times for lawyers, politicians, and real people. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 2:40 pm
Note that there is nothing wrong with holding bloggers responsible for defamatory content that they themselves produce, as long as the states' rules are consistent with the constitutional rules of New York Times v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:35 am
"Indeed, even if [the defendant] had made an explicit promise that, upon separation, [the plaintiff] would be entitled to 'equitable distribution' of their assets, it would be unenforceable, as it would be contrary to the long-standing law and policy in New York that unmarried partners are not entitled to the same property and financial rights upon termination of the relationship as married people," Justice Gesmer wrote in Ericson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 8:01 am
It wasn't long before Justice Thomas Ruffin's opinion in State v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 6:20 am
For some, those documents were shocking revelations; for privacy activists and digerati who have followed cases like Jewel v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 12:30 am
I have no knowledge of this particular case but it does illustrate the fact that with the consequences of a drink-drive conviction being so serious (and at the reading quoted in the report prison, as well as a very long driving ban has to be a possibility) many people who can afford it are prepared to pay many thousands of pounds to specialist lawyers to fight the case. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:29 am
Because of a Supreme Court decision in 2005, "Kelo V. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 9:30 am
One of the cases she cited, of which I was previously unaware, was Minor v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:57 am
Long Island Railroad. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:41 am
The study also refutes the common mistaken belief that questions about abortion rights have played a dominant role in confirmation hearings since Roe v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 3:30 pm
Too bad they can't charge admission… http://ow.ly/4ZRGr # Chief Justice Roberts on law review articles: "largely of no use or interest to people who actually practice law. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 1:44 pm
City of Boise the court said "As long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property... [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 6:23 pm
All decade long people pondered what would be the next asbestos, when it turns out that asbestos is the next asbestos. . . [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:20 am
” [See Wallis v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:13 pm
Two years after the Katz decision, in the case of Smith v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 4:54 am
Young v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
But in Yick Wo v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:55 pm
[Day v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:43 pm
If you’ve seen the apocalyptic articles on the tech news sites following the jury’s verdict on the copyright claim in Oracle v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:06 pm
For a long time we have waited for a bold move by the courts. [read post]
