Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 6481 - 6500 of 9,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2012, 5:50 pm by Brian Wm. Higgins
Rosetta Stone press release (April 10, 2012): "Rosetta Stone greatly appreciates today's opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm by Bexis
United States, 132 S.Ct. 2492 (2012), and Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
United States (11-9540, grant limited to the first question raised). [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:26 pm by Jim von der Heydt
With school starting up again, I’ve made less progress this month than I hoped in identifying for myself what is so remarkable about Justice Roberts’ forbearance in NFIB v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:54 pm by Jim von der Heydt
 So Justice Roberts overruled it:  Bush v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:31 am by Gene Quinn
Teva, Barr and APP all appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:31 am by Gene Quinn
Teva, Barr and APP all appealed from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware holding that U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:28 pm by Leland E. Beck
Preventive Care / Contraceptive Rule:  In another case seeking relief from the Affordable Care Act Preventative Services (contraceptives) Rule, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the complaint in Wheaton College v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
The United States’ Stolen Valor Act criminalized lies about the receipt of a military decoration. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 12:30 pm by Robert Wagner
Stinger Systems, Case No. 2:09-cv-289, in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada—alleging a number of claims, including violations of the Lanham Act. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:31 am by Robert L Abell
And the Supreme Court ruled that a general verdict that can be supported by at least one theory is enough, even though it is impossible to tell which theory the jury actually relied on, in Griffin v United States, 502 US 46 (1991). [read post]