Search for: "Smith v Smith" Results 6481 - 6500 of 14,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2017, 11:39 am by Anthony McCain
Nancy Urizar: Supreme Court Of The United States To Hear Oral Arguments In Patent Exhaustion Case Andy Lucas & Robyn Chatwood: Intellectual Property Rights In A Virtual World Deanna Okun: US Must Bolster Fight With China Over Intellectual Property Rights Matthew Humphries: Sony Patent Wants Every Gadget To Double As A Wireless Charger Evan Engstrom: In Apple v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 5:40 am by Charon QC
We look at the employment law implications for use of social media in some depth and discuss the important case of Smith v Trafford Housing Trust [2012] EWHC 3221 (Ch) We then move on to discuss practice at the Bar, the immediate to medium term prospects for barristers and Sean Jones QC provides some advice for prospective barristers. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:42 am by James Romoser
Alito says high court is no such thing (Casey Smith & Jessica Gresko, Associated Press) The Supreme Court is in the building — contentious rulings behind, more major cases ahead (Mark Walsh, ABA Journal) Mississippi abortion clinic braces for Supreme Court showdown over Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As the IAS court found, the allegations underlying plaintiff’s malpractice claim were couched in terms of “gross speculations” about future events, without the requisite factual basis to support the allegation (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson looks at the Court’s 1979 decision in Smith v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:54 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 1:00 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP.
Partially allowing the appeal, a Court of Appeal panel of Smith LJ, Leveson LJ and Sir Mark Waller once again dismissed the application for summary judgment on procedural grounds but found against the claimants on the points on limitation. [read post]