Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6481 - 6500
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
United States. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
The Fortieth Anniversary of the United States Supreme Court's Landmark Decision, Roe V. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
Contents include:Case CommentsHans van Houtte & Bridie McAsey, Abaclat and others v Argentine Republic: ICSID, the BIT and Mass Claims Andrea Marco Steingruber, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Consent in Large-scale Arbitration Proceedings Céline Lévesque, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: The Definition of Investment Samuel Wordsworth, Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Pre-conditions to… [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 9:34 pm
Unlike some other countries, such as the United States and England, India does not have sentencing guidelines, which provide rules and principles for judges to follow while sentencing. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Williams, 868 S.W.2d 294, 296 (Tex. 1993)(stating that opinions from any federal or state court may be relied on a persuasive authority, but Texas appellate courts are obligated to follow only higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:29 pm
Federal Circuit on Software Patents: Show Me the AlgorithmsEarlier today the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Noah Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
On its face, it does by specifying that the defendant must have “withheld from or misrepresented to the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
On its face, it does by specifying that the defendant must have “withheld from or misrepresented to the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 12:25 pm
Last Fall Steve posted about United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
United States Patent No. 3,178,242 (filed May 13, 1963) (“Ellis”) discloses a beverage carton with a removable corner and a finger opening(...)So let’s be clear what claim 2 is about. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 12:31 am
The sad thing about this book is that it reflects the notion that the dialogue over the intellectual commons is an exclusively United States affair, which is by and large true. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
22 Dec 2012, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
Instead of an increase in cost per treatment or per unit cost of a service such as a doctor’s visit, it is the amount of services and the types of services being used driving medical inflation. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 8:38 am
United States, No. 12-173C (Nov. 27, 2012). [read post]
