Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 48,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2011, 10:35 am
Its importance, and the potential for litigants to use the principle for their own ends, were considered in a judgment on the costs arising from an interim application given by Tugendhat J on 2 December 2011 (Coward v Harraden [2011] EWHC 3092 (QB)). [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 4:49 am
See Johnson v. 27th Ave. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 11:10 am
In in South [Dakota] v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:59 am
Compensation for court document translations, as mentioned in a previous legal translation blog post, and the Supreme Court's decision in Taniguchi v. [read post]
28 May 2016, 4:50 pm
The law Whipple J cited R (Lord Carlile of Berriew) v SSHD [2014] UKSC 60, as the relevant guidance as to the approach that should be taken in considering allegations that a public authority had impermissibly interfered with an individual’s rights under Articles 10 and 11. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:54 am
Mr Justice Burton concluded his judgment by stating that the choice by an insured of his own lawyer did not "of itself constitute the taking of an unreasonable step".___________________________________ 1(1) Christine Brown-Quinn (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) Motorplus Ltd: Webster Dixton LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management Ltd (2) ACM ULR Ltd: (1) Janine Baxter (2) Webster Dixon LLP v (1) Equity Syndicate Management (2)… [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:26 am
The case is Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:31 am
In Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:33 am
STERRETT, an individual, v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Efforts at Workers Comp Cost Reduction Should Not Be Left to Carrier Efforts at comp claim cost reduction should not be left to a carrier. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:09 am
Vivo and--potentially--Vivo v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 8:35 pm
These individuals are experiencing increased competition for reservations in their home resort, increased costs of ownership, infringement of their ownership rights, and diminished value and marketability of their real property.A copy of the Plaintiffs Amended Class Action Complaint is available for review and download at: https://www.nfllp.com/cases/consumer-antitrust-and-other-litigation/lennen-v-marriott-ownership-resorts-inc-et-al-/ [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 9:37 am
(“Cass”) and Drummond v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:39 pm
As we’ve explained before, the Federal Circuit’s decision in Berkheimer v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 1:06 am
Friends of Aviara v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 1:36 pm
This leaves Ford with the full burden of costs of the class action lawsuit. [read post]
30 Nov 2013, 4:06 pm
RYAN, Petitioner, v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 9:35 am
On 11 October 2022 a unilateral statement in open court [pdf] was read before Nicklin J in the case of Smith v Backhouse. [read post]
