Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 6501 - 6520 of 12,270
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Appeal of JANE DOE from action of the Board of Education of the Port Byron Central School District regarding a personnel action.Decision of the Commissioner of Education, Decision No. 17,627Elia, Commissioner. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:12 am by Ron Pollock
  There will be one major exception though, wherein prior art does not include disclosures made by an applicant or obtained through the applicant 1 year or less before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Ladd v Marshall [1954 EWCA Civ 1; MMI Research v Cellxion [2012] EWCA Civ 7).Brian also reminded the audience of the three categories of amendments recognised by Jacob LJ in Nikken v Pioneer [2005] EWCA Civ 906:(a) before a trial; (b) after trial, at which certain claims have been held valid but other claims held invalid, the patentee simply wishing to delete the invalid claims (I would include here also the case where the patentee wishes to re-write the claims so… [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Zuri Blackmon
The King Law Reporter will be available on Fastcase.com for free through February 2018. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm by Colter Paulson and Trane Robinson
  That tradition persisted through the New Deal, the Court recounted, when decisions like Skidmore v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 7:43 am by Kirk Jenkins
“[S]ection 5 of article XIII does not establish any ‘vesting rules,’” the Court wrote. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 5:44 am by Ray Mullman
"If I was on a phone call with a client, I would have to have a piece of paper or a computer program where I kept track of every second I was talking to that person, and it drove me nuts. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm by Aurora Barnes
Alabama 16-9282 Issue: Whether, when trial counsel does not testify about his or her own strategic decisions as part of a claim under Strickland v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 9:23 am by Eric Goldman
Moreover, she had an interest in continuing to work with Google and eBay in the future, which Defendants impeded through their intentional conduct. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Div. 1991) (stating that New York law does not recognize a defamation claim where the plaintiff voluntarily republished the alleged defamatory words); Doe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 9:41 am by Shea Denning
If the value is less than $20,000, the offense is a Class I felony. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 10:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Dewberry Group, Inc. v. [read post]