Search for: "Does, 1-20"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 27,661
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2010, 10:22 am
See infra at pp. 20-22. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:53 pm
§28-1382(A)(1). [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:54 am
See Israel v Wood Dolson Co., 1 NY2d 116 (1956); see also John J. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 8:46 am
cb=1 [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:52 am
This list does not indicate these businesses are sources of this outbreak; at this time, no infections have been linked to exposure to these businesses. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 5:10 pm
What does this mean for you? [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 5:32 pm
Previous posts on this topic: Proposed changes to NRAP 1, 2 and 3 Proposed changes to NRAP 3A, 3B and 3C NRAP 3D Judicial Discipline: Right to Appeal; How Taken; Rules Governing (page 20 of the pdf) There are a few stylistic changes. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 10:13 am
The Court held that the “substantial assistance” prong of Section 20(e) does not require the SEC to show proximate causation. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 8:34 am
Does the president really think it wise to eliminate tax provisions that encourage investment in technology and exploration and development and would likely constrict future energy supplies, raise energy costs and kill jobs? [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
This Article thus does not refer to the absence of a procedure but only to the absence of procedural provisions. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:32 am
On August 25, 2023, two SEC compliance and disclosure interpretations (“C&DI”) were issued related to these quarterly disclosures.[1] C&DI 133A.01 states that Item 408(a)(1) of Regulation S-K does not require disclosure of termination of a plan that ends due to expiration or completion of the plan in accordance with its terms, without any action by an individual. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
However, paragraph 1 does not require that the request be filed and the documents be produced at the same date.In the present case, on 24 January 2010 the alleged appellant filed the notice of appeal dated 23 January 2010, produced an assignment document at the same time, but failed to file a request for transfer of the patent as required by R 22(1). [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 8:14 am
As noted at the LSO's bencher FAQ: A total of 40 lawyer benchers are elected - 20 from inside Toronto, and 20 from outside Toronto. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm
On the date the codicil was executed, September 27, 1984, AT & T was listed at 20, and the shares in the seven RHCs ranged between 63 3/8 to 77 1/8, with the exception of Bell South, listed at 32 3/8 because of the three-for-one split. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 9:17 am
But does this really democratize them, even just from the 0.1 percent to the full 10 percent, given under whose direction the well-paid flunkies are laboring? [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 7:01 am
What does this mean for 2017? [read post]
11 May 2014, 5:49 pm
” [1] 8 CFR §§214.2(h)(4)(i)(B)(l) and 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(B)(l); 20 CFR §655.700(a)(3) and (b); INA §212(n)(1) [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:36 pm
(c) If the Supreme Court determines that the reapportionment does not comply with subsection (1) of this section and all law applicable thereto, the reapportionment shall be void. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
If so, then the ADA does not require the employer to continue the light duty assignment. [read post]
