Search for: "John Robert" Results 6501 - 6520 of 20,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 11:49 am by Lyle Denniston
Stephen Vladeck, a University of Texas law professor who follows the Court closely, noted Kennedy’s retirement Wednesday with this Twitter entry: “John Roberts just became the single most important person in America. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:26 am by William Hibbitts
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Anthony Kennedy and Neil Gorsuch joined the majority opinion while Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan wrote dissents with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sotomayor joining the latter. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:08 am by Kristen Waggoner
And neither Chief Justice John Roberts nor Gorsuch nor Justice Samuel Alito appears to be a fan. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am by John Eastman
Although Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the majority opinion, and Justice Anthony Kennedy, who wrote a concurrence, clearly offered no quarter to those prior statements, the proclamation was itself facially neutral and bona fide, and that ended the matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:27 am by SHG
Chief Justice John Roberts is either a very stupid man, or he believes that the rest of us are very stupid. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:32 pm by Howard Bashman
” Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed News reports that “The Supreme Court Upholds Trump’s Travel Ban; The 5–4 majority decision was written by Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:36 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In writing the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote: “We express no view on the soundness of the policy. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 4:02 pm by Tom Smith
Notably, Chief Justice John Roberts and the majority clearly telegraph their disagreement with the president’s comments, as have many of us. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:32 pm by Peter Margulies
The court’s traditional deference to the president on foreign affairs and national security drove the 5-4 decision, in which Chief Justice John Roberts (joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch) rejected both statutory and constitutional challenges to Proclamation No. 9645, which followed two executive orders. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
The decision, written by Chief Justice John Roberts and joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, held that “[t]he President has lawfully exercised the broad discretion granted to him under [8 U.S.C.] [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm by Mark Walsh
Whether that member voted early or will be getting to the polls today, we hope he finds the “island of calm in which voters can peacefully contemplate their choices,” as Chief Justice John Roberts put it in the recent decision in Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 12:44 pm by Ilya Somin
In a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice John Roberts, the justices largely upheld President Donald Trump's "proclamation" banning nearly all entry into the United States by citizens of five Muslim-majority nations. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:30 am by Victoria Clark
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority opinion that the ban did not exceed Trump’s authority under Section 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:18 am by Hilary Hurd, Yishai Schwartz
In a 5-4 decision, with the majority opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court issued two core holdings: (a) that the latest ban does not exceed the president’s authority under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA); and (b) that ban does not violate the Establishment Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:40 am
  From the Wall Street Journal:The court, in a 5-4 opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, said Tuesday that Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am by Marty Lederman
"  The Roberts opinion for the majority, by contrast, does not deal wth this question at all, because it follows the lesson of Katz that the Fourth Amendment is not literally limited to intrusions upon persons, houses, papers and effects. [read post]