Search for: "State v. Michael A." Results 6501 - 6520 of 13,677
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Secretary of State for the Home Department v B2, heard 18 November 2014. [read post]
5 May 2007, 6:39 am
A brief decision from the Second Department on May 1 decided this issue apparently for the first time in the State - Michael Reilly Design, Inc. v Houraney, 2007 NY Slip Op 03890. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:41 am by Don Cruse
Veterans Land Board of the State of Texas (VLB), et al., No. 09? [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:28 am by Marie Louise
Wares and Services Manual expands (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trade-marks: Use it as registered: Bigras v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC affirms validity and enforceability of Eisai’s compound patent on Aciphex; elucidates current standard for obviousness of chemical composition of matter patents: Eisai v Reddy’s Lab’s and Teva Pharma: (Orange Book Blog), (Patent Docs), (Patent Prospector), (IP Law360), (Hal Wegner), (Patent Baristas),… [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
The words “citizens of the United States,” and “citizens of the States,” as employed in the fourteenth amendment, did not change or modify the relations of citizens of the State and nation as they existed under the original Constitution. . . . [read post]