Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 6501 - 6520
of 8,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 1:02 pm
GlaxoSmithKline, et al., was brought six years ago by a former GSK employee under the federal False Claims Act. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
These employees are firearms and tactics instructors and the case is entitled Falla et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
articleURI=info%3Adoi%2F10.1289%2Fehp.1002514 [xiii] Vandenberg LN et al, above [xiv] Taylor JA et al, above [xv] Vandenberg LN et al, above [xvi] European Food Safety Authority. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:39 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 6:25 pm
(Gifford et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 11:42 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 10:46 am
So this is my concern: If it is politically unrealistic to consider going after Barack Obama and Harold Koh and Leon Panetta and Joe Biden, et al., and that is the reason (or a big part of it) for not pursuing criminal sanctions that follow upon criminality, well, one has to wonder when it will be politically realistic. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 9:54 am
So this is my concern: If it is politically unrealistic to consider going after Barack Obama and Harold Koh and Leon Panetta and Joe Biden, et al., and that is the reason for not pursuing criminal sanctions that follow upon criminality, well, one has to wonder when it will be politically realistic. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:08 am
" United States of America, ex rel. et. al. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:14 am
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, et al., 598 F.3d 918 (7th Cir. 2010), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed that clear and unambiguous language in pollution exclusion clauses is necessary in order to bar coverage for environmental contamination claims. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
PriceDocket: 10-10Issue(s): Whether an indigent defendant has a constitutional right to appointed counsel at a civil contempt proceeding that results in his incarceration.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of South Carolina)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Aqua Flora, Inc. et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
Michael Whitten, et al., 2010 U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 5:45 pm
Goossens H, Giesendorf AJ, Vandamme P, et al. (1995). [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 7:02 am
Had Google gotten their way, Viacom would have had to join forces with Premier League et al to file one appeal brief. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm
To obtain information for their study, La Porta et al. sent one questionnaire to a lawyer in each of the 49 countries each of whom subsequently “confirmed the validity” of their answers and then coded the information on these questionnaires according to the variables chosen. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:53 am
Nye, et al., No. 09? [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 8:10 am
The United States favored a stay of litigation in San Francisco Technologies v Adobe, et al., in the Northern District of California this spring to await the Federal Circuit’s decision in Stauffer.Now the Federal Circuit has line up squarely against Simonian in this matter. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:50 pm
Acer, Inc. et al (EDTexweblog.com) Apple – HyperMac to halt MagSafe sales, hopes to appease Apple (Ars Technica) EON – Motion to compel pre-suit investigation documents and for sanctions – granted as to logging / denied as to waiver: EON Corp. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:21 am
Law Lessons from VLAD OURITSKI, ET AL. [read post]
