Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 7,360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2011, 7:58 pm
See SFAT’s Decision (Wan Ten Lok and Yan Kwok Ting Sunny v SFC, Application No 8 and 9 of 2009) published on the SFAT’s website at http://www.sfat.gov.hk/english/determination/AN-8_9-2009-Determination.pdf, para 163, para 172-182, para 192-193, para 194 -204 respectively.5. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:37 am
The concept is still rather wooly, but the approach remains that of Lord Bingham in M v Secretary of States for Work and Pensions [2006] 2 AC 91, encapsulated by Lady Hale as “the closer the facts come to the protection of the core values of the substantive article, the more likely it is that they fall within its ambit. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 5:46 am
The case, filed January 22, 2006, is entitled Walker v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:59 am
A question on communication to the public has been referred by the English court to the CJEU. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 3:26 pm
At the outset, it is observed that choice of law considerations are relegated to a secondary position in international civil and commercial litigation before the English courts as compared to international jurisdictional and procedural issues. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 1:28 am
The Supreme Court held that to allow further unrestricted publication by the English media would nevertheless add significantly to the intrusiveness and distress felt by the claimant and his family. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 12:16 am
Ilyin and Others v Ukraine (no. 74852/14): about the Kyiv City State Administration’s refusal to register a community of the Unification Church. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 10:48 am
In Northington v. [read post]
“Blackmail” costs system violated Daily Mirror’s freedom of expression rights in Naomi Campbell case
18 Jan 2011, 7:20 am
Rosalind English’s analysis of the decision is here. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:36 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg) and C-559/20 (Koch Media GmbH v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 4:16 am
Thus, a petitioner is entitled to obtain the identity of prospective defendants where a petitioner has alleged facts, which state a cause of action (see Matter of Toal v Staten Is. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
The English courts and resolutions of the House of Commons condemned both abuses distinctly. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 1:36 pm
Morris-Sharma has argued that although the investor-state dispute settlement regime mainly concerns state-to-state obligations, a foreign (private) investor may bring a claim directly against the state. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:Chinese company Zhongyi Electronic sues Microsoft for alleged patent infringement relating to technology that converts Roman characters to Chinese characters: (Jurist), (China Hearsay), (IP Dragon),US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent … [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
State Bd. of Exam'rs. of Pub. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:16 pm
App. 2003); Gorman v. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:25 pm
In the context of a recent reference to the European Court of Justice from the English Court (Case C-127/04, O’Byrne v Sanofi Pasteur MDS Limited and Sanofi Pasteur SA) Advocate-General Geelhoed stated in his opinion that “if the supplier is erroneously sued as the producer, he should immediately inform the suing party as to the identity of the producer… If he were to fail to do so, by analogy with Article 3(3) of the Directive he should be… [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 2:46 pm
Unlike the fourteenth century English statute that criminalized imagining the death of the King, our laws "do not punish people's culpable mental states unless they take some implementing action. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
