Search for: "State v. Powers"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 36,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2021, 5:21 am
The Constitutional Court of Thailand ruled Wednesday that three anti-government activists who had called for a reform in the country’s powerful monarchy had violated the constitution through a “[v]eiled attempt to overthrow the institution. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:27 am
In McCabe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 6:34 am
Automated Merchandising v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:47 am
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 4:57 am
The Colorado Supreme Court handed down a decision in the matter of Lujan v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:04 pm
The lead case is Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
From a UCL standpoint, this is the most interesting paragraph in the opinion: In the UCL context, in Spielholz[v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:20 am
Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 6:14 am
In the foundational separation-of-powers case Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 2:49 am
In Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 3:18 am
Fair Isaac Corp. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:07 am
State Supreme Court Judge John R. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 4:25 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:15 pm
” United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 7:38 am
In Favalora v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:08 pm
"UT Austin's Consideration of Race in Admissions is Narrow, Necessary and Constitutional": The University of Texas at Austin today issued a news release that begins, "Today, the University of Texas at Austin filed its brief to the United States Supreme Court as respondent in the case of Fisher v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 7:23 pm
In the case of Meemic Insurance Co. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:02 am
Adler) In non-mandate news, the Supreme Court issued two merits opinions today, including Zivotofsky v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:15 am
” Velander v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:46 pm
On May 25, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) made its final decision on a long-running case that will redefine the power and authority that the United States Environmental Protection agency (EPA) will have to regulate and protect the navigable waters of the United States (WOTUS). [read post]
