Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 13,838
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2015, 7:31 am
On appeal the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, affirmed the holding that the gas station could not argue an equal protection claim based on alleged different treatment that the stations received, because the two stations were not similarly situated. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 8:25 pm
" Although counsel for the parties in the United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 3:03 pm
Kash, The United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:49 am
The plaintiff hired Allied to move some of his household goods from southern California to the United Arab Emirates (UAE). [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:05 am
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
" The "divisible divorce" is rooted in a hoary old United States Supreme Court case called Pennoyer v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:47 am
¶44 (quoting State of Minn. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:13 am
In addition to working for much lower pay, they also do not receive any benefits and must provide their own hard hats, rigging equipment, and steel-toed boots, which the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requires all employees to wear when working as stagehands. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 5:50 am
The article addresses a recent case by the Supreme Court of the United States, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
While the Supreme Court has not retreated from the core holding in Ferber, it has made shutting down the marketplace more difficult with its child pornography holdings in a series of cases, including United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 7:31 pm
From the complaint: AB 5 violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and the Contracts Clause of Article I of the United States Constitution, as well as the Equal Protection Clause, Inalienable Rights Clause, Due Process Clause, Baby Ninth Amendment, and Contracts Clause of the California Constitution. 1. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 7:44 pm
With respect to F&V, LP stated that it served its first round of discovery requests on September 20, 2011, and F&V did not serve responses until November 2, 2011. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am
United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:11 pm
As an aside, United States v. 4.0 Acres of Land was an Arizona case, where the U.S. government condemned land to build a federal courthouse. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
District Court for the Southern District of California, arguing that he was not given a “meaningful right to apply for asylum,” in violation of 8 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 6:33 pm
Campbell, invalidity theoriesof defendant Campbell were rejected, but enhanced damageanalysis by CD Cal was rejected.Campbell Company (“Campbell”) appeals from the finaljudgment of the United States District Court for theCentral District of California entering judgment in favorof Polara Engineering Inc. [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am
Conventional wisdom says that the current iteration of the United States Supreme Court is pro-business. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
United States, involving a “meaty Speech or Debate clause” issue. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 1:44 pm
United States, 131 S. [read post]
