Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6521 - 6540
of 10,394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
An award is allowed only where the court finds that ‘the position of the United States was vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Tomorrow, on February 8, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 7:25 am
ZTE and Conversant v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 12:47 am
Supreme Court (SC) in Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
As reported by CNN: Five speech therapists in Hong Kong were found guilty of a conspiracy to publish seditious children's books on Wednesday, in a case that rights defenders say marks a major blow to free speech amid a tightening of civil liberties in the Chinese territory. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:45 am
v=0MDBIGACxig&t=60s. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:00 am
Dunsmuir is — by some distance — the most cited decision of any Canadian court and, for Canadians and Canadaphiles, synonymous with… The Lean Law FirmSmall Firms, Big Issues: Highlights of Thomson Reuters’ 2017 State of US Small Law Firms Survey More than half of all lawyers in the United States and Canada work in small firms of less than 30 people. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
Just over a month ago (in a coda to "'Hungarians' and Hungarians attack the CTM"), the IPKat mentioned a Hungarian Patent Office decision, CITY INN v C CITY HOTEL, which preferred the approach taken by the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) in ONEL v OMEL to the conventional wisdom of most of the rest of Europe and concluded that a Community trade mark is not genuinely used if it is not used in more than one country within the European… [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:19 am
“However, since Abood, the Supreme Court has repeatedly acknowledged that compelling a state employee to financially support a public sector union seriously impinges upon free speech and association interests protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution,” he argued, among other contentions. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 4:06 am
Flickr user objects to Independent newspaper’s unauthorised use of his photo (1709 Copyright Blog) (IP Whiteboard) Copyright woes of a game designer: Burrows v Smith (IP Osgoode) Neutralize UK file-sharing legal threats – Join TalkTalk (TorrentFreak) EWHC: No infringement; invalidity for lack of inventive step: Research in Motion Limited v Motorola (EPLAW) (IPKat) United States US Patents Claiming under the influence (of Bilski) (12:01 Tuesday)… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm
Max Rack, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
Sources: United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:33 pm
” It added: “While [they] understandably do not wish to be released to their home country, the fact that the United States has yet to identify an appropriate alternative country to taked them does not mean that the government is in violation of the Court’s order. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am
As explained in paragraph 42 of this judgment, in paragraph 37 of Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9, Lord Hoffmann explained that the doctrine of equivalents had been developed in the United States. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:39 am
United States, No. 17-5716. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am
As explained in paragraph 42 of this judgment, in paragraph 37 of Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9, Lord Hoffmann explained that the doctrine of equivalents had been developed in the United States. [read post]
