Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 48,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2010, 5:57 pm
" This is an important case because it is the first dispositive decision in a post production cost deduction case post Kilmer v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Will that add substantial cost? [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:46 am
• Ground 3: The Order as to costs was wrong. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 2:58 am
Please see the UKSC Blog New Judgment post for Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP here. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm
Armisted v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 9:30 am
In Fonovisa v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 4:00 am
McGee v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:24 pm
I've been around law schools for over 20 years now and the theory v. practice argument was old when I was applying to law school. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 1:47 pm
In today’s case (Baiden v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:41 am
In an interesting approach to get around the limited success rate surrounding this argument, the dad in Radcliffe v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 2:31 am
In this case, Delgado v. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 9:43 am
The district court Subsequently granted Colón Cabrera's motion, but chose to dismiss the case with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) and assess attorneys' fees and costs against him. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm
On September 26, 2011, the WCAB issued an en banc decision in Messele v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:10 am
What happens if a telecommuting employee is given the choice to use his home computer, which may be a lot nicer than, for example, a cost-effective employer-provided laptop? [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 8:09 pm
Onyiuke v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:48 pm
Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit issued its long-awaited decision in the class action lawsuit entitled Parth v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 1:12 am
As such, Smith J awarded only nominal damages plus costs. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 5:25 am
Gribble v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:01 pm
All the parties — and there were many in Western Sugar Cooperative, et al. v. [read post]