Search for: "D. STEVENS" Results 6541 - 6560 of 6,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
We had a post by Steven BarnettSimon Neville who has worked for both papers, has written an open letter to Mail editor Paul Dacre. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 11:08 am
Unlike Bazzle, Stolt-Nielsen: (a) is venued in federal court; (b) involves international maritime contracts, not domestic consumer ones; (c) concerns federal maritime and New York state law, rather than South Carolina arbitration law; (d) features a reasoned, "Class Construction" arbitration award concluding that the pertinent arbitration agreements were silent on class arbitration; and (e) presents no dispute about whether the arbitration agreements are in fact silent on class… [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 10:22 pm by jordan
Potential Pitfalls to Avoid After a not-at-fault accident, you’d expect a straightforward path to medical recovery. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am by Arturo Jara
” Just Mercy Plot: In this film based on a true story, Bryan Stevenson, a new lawyer and recent Harvard graduate, moves to Alabama and takes the case of a death row inmate, Walter “Johnny D. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 6:35 am
If you are licensed in Massachusetts, and a member of the MBA, you’d be foolish not to use it. [read post]
1 May 2020, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
But I thought I'd pass along our amicus brief for those who are interested in such things—and of course I wanted to thank our superb pro bono local counsel, Noell Tin of Tin Fulton Walker & Owen, and my student Bruce Lee, who worked on the brief with me. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 8:15 pm by Guest Author
”  So, after 50 years of doing this stuff, I’m confused and because I’m a generous guy, I’d like to share my confusion. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  By a vote of 8-0, with Justice William Brennan writing the opinion and Justice John Paul Stevens not participating, the Court upheld California's law as not pre-empting the Federal law of immigration. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am by Schachtman
Mo. 1986) (noting relative risk of 3.89–3.92 for GBS from swine-flu vaccine), aff’d in part, 830 F.2d 831 (8th Cir. 1987)). [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 9:37 pm
The amici would assist the Trial Chamber by (a) making any submissions properly open to the accused by way of preliminary or other pretrial motion; (b) making any submissions or objections to evidence properly open to the accused during the trial proceedings and cross-examining witnesses as appropriate; (c) drawing to the attention of the Trial Chamber any exculpatory or mitigating evidence; and (d) acting in any other way that designated counsel considers appropriate in order to secure a… [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:00 pm by SCOTUStalk
And to use the legal term that my friend Steven Mazie of the Economist, used on Twitter, they punted, so to speak. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 3:19 pm by Renee C. Quinn
I’d also point out it is not just a job for government, creating this climate depends on all of us. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:43 am by Bill Marler
On Jan. 19, 2020, we filed a petition with USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), on behalf of Rick Schiller, Steven Romes, the Porter family, Food & Water Watch, Consumer Federation of America, and Consumer Reports. 20-01-marler-011920 The petition asked FSIS to declare the following Salmonella “outbreak serotypes” as per se contaminants (adulterants) in meat and poultry products: Salmonella Agona, Anatum, Berta, Blockely, Braenderup, Derby, Dublin,… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm by Venkat
Stevens (the dogfighting depiction case) but it seemed to ignore the Supreme Court’s rejection of a “free floating First Amendment test” where the value of speech is measured against its societal costs. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:28 am
   The case grew out of the smoking addiction and the death of an Oregon man, Jesse D. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:24 pm by The Book Review Editor
In the end, following a detailed and critically nuanced discussion, Sagar concludes that leakers can be morally justified in making an unauthorized disclosure of classified information in violation of the law if the disclosure meets the following five conditions: It “(a) reveals an abuse of public authority; (b) is based on clear and convincing evidence; (c) does not pose a disproportionate threat to public safety; (d) is limited in scope and scale as far as is possible; and (e) is… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 7:16 am by David Lat
He has written several law review articles and three books (affiliate links): The Obesity Myth: Why America’s Obsession with Weight is Hazardous to Your Health (2004), Jurismania: The Madness of American Law (1999), and Against the Law (1996; co-authored with Pierre Schlag and Steven D. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am by Betsy McKenzie
Justice Roberts wrote for the majority, and Breyer wrote a passionate dissent, with Justices Stevens, Ginsburg and Sotomayor joining, that, with appendices, occupies more space than the majority opinion. [read post]