Search for: "John Robert" Results 6541 - 6560 of 20,569
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 7:15 pm by Erin McCarthy Holliday
.'” Gorsuch also wrote that civil issue preclusion principles are not meant for criminal law via the Double Jeopardy Clause, in Part III of his opinion which only Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito joined: While the growing number of criminal offenses in our statute books may be cause for concern, no one should expect (or want) judges to revise the Constitution to address every social problem they happen to perceive. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:30 pm by Elie Mystal
FOURTH AMENDMENT PORN: John Roberts sided with the liberals and brought the Fourth Amendment to a stunning climax. [read post]
” The 5-4 decision, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, emphasizes the sensitivity of cell phone location information, which the Court described as “deeply revealing” because of its “depth, breadth, and comprehensive reach, and the inescapable and automatic nature of its collection. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:47 am by Mark Walsh
In the VIP box, Jane Roberts, the wife of Chief Justice John Roberts, is here today. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:07 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority: We decline to grant the state unrestricted access to a wireless carrier’s database of physical location information. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am by Sabrina McCubbin
As predicted, Chief Justice Roberts authored the majority opinion, reversing the Sixth Circuit’s decision. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 9:54 am by Howard Bashman
” And Chris Geidner of BuzzFeed News reports that “The Supreme Court Rules That Police Generally Need A Warrant To Get Cell-Site Records; The 5-4 decision — in which Chief Justice John Roberts joined his four more liberal colleagues in the majority — is a victory for privacy advocates. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:26 am by Amy Howe
In an opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, the five-justice majority pointed to “seismic shifts in digital technology,” which have allowed wireless carriers to collect “deeply revealing” information about cellphone owners that should be protected by the Constitution. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:23 am by Lyle Denniston
Roberts, Jr., and joined by the four most liberal Justices. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 8:19 am by Cyrus Farivar
Building on two other previous pro-privacy decisions that the court reached in recent years, Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, found that cell phones are different. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:23 am
            Robert Bork wrote a law review article and book that help support the view that antirust courts and regulators should use a consumer welfare template for assessing mergers, rather than consider market share. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 7:23 am
            Robert Bork wrote a law review article and book that help support the view that antirust courts and regulators should use a consumer welfare template for assessing mergers, rather than consider market share. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 3:20 pm by Mark Walsh
The justices take the bench right on time and Chief Justice John Roberts announces that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in Wisconsin Central Ltd. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a dissent that was joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am by Amy Howe
This is the only decision outstanding from the court’s December sitting (which began on November 27), and Chief Justice John Roberts is the only justice who has not written for that sitting, which means he is likely writing the opinion. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:15 am by Lyle Denniston
  Four members of the Court, dissenting in an opinion written by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 7:23 am by Kevin Kaufman
Four justices (Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, and Justice Elena Kagan) dissented, agreeing that the Court got it wrong before but arguing that Congress should fix it. [read post]