Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 18,227
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2011, 7:32 am
For Skid-e-kids, the FTC’s settlement means taking remedial measures such as destroying all of the information collected from children in violation of the COPPA Rule, providing links to online educational material, and retaining an online privacy professional or joining an approved COPPA safe harbor program to oversee applicable COPPA-covered websites; an injunction against future violations of COPPA and misrepresentations about the collection of children’s information; and a… [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 6:03 pm
As a result, covered institutions must "provide equal athletic opportunity for members of both sexes. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:08 am
Urgent Call for Action Mark Greisiger, President of NetDiligence, provided crucial commentary on the study’s findings. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
Once a Notice of Covered Action is posted by the SEC, individuals have 90 calendar days to apply for an award. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:41 pm
It has implications on the sensibility of extending existing legal doctrines to cover the activities of artificial agents. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:29 am
Smith J accepted Lidl’s arguments that consumers recognise the Lidl Marks as indicating Lidl’s goodwill, which included its reputation as a discounter, offering goods at low prices but stopped short of widening this to cover an unspecified “quality” or “standard” of goods. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:30 am
® means the owner actually has federally-registered the designation as a trademark or a service mark (I suppose it also could mean the designation is registered as a certification mark or collective mark, but those are few and far between) for the goods or services covered by the symbol’s use — for more details on the proper use of the ® notice symbol, check my post from a few years back: Registration Symbol Misuse As Trademark Fraud? [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 9:28 am
Domain Name Renewal As with trademarks, domain name registrations cover a fixed period of time and will eventually “die” if you fail to renew them. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 3:58 am
China’s trademark system allows (and implicitly encourages) trademark owners to file applications covering goods they do not actually use. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 3:31 am
Currently, a copyright covers a work for a finite period of 70 years plus the life of an author (unless the work is deemed a “work-for-hire”) and is not renewable. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 3:55 pm
The cover story, by talented Allen & Overy triumvirate Nicola Dagg, Philip Mansfield and Mark Ridgeway, is all about the interplay between patent law (which creates monopolies), competition law (which neuters them, if you're unlucky) and technical standards (which force monopolies open by decreeing them essential for everyone to use). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:55 am
Registration Nos. 2,674,112; 2,988,402 and 3,088,995 for CABO PRIMO & Design, LOS CABOS & Design and CABO CLASSICS, all covering food items such as “burritos, enchiladas, tacos” and other Mexican style food products. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
This is a good idea in principle, but as all trade mark owners know, their rights in their registered mark only extend to the goods and services covered by their registration (or similar goods and services), and so this could simply function as an unnecessary deterrent to new business entrants. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 2:30 am
I suspect that the advertising/marketing folks who brought us this promotion were not consciously attempting to cover both of these alternative bases for the commercial role played by trade marks. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:08 am
In trademark law, on the one hand the principle of territoriality of IP rights could prohibit an interpretation of the term which would also cover possessing the products in Spain (where the German mark is not protected). [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 4:44 am
Protection in Germany of some of those trade marks was refused in 1973, 1992 and 1993. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 4:41 am
You can put these things in contracts but you better not count on them as always covering your southern quadrant. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
This is a good idea in principle, but as all trade mark owners know, their rights in their registered mark only extend to the goods and services covered by their registration (or similar goods and services), and so this could simply function as an unnecessary deterrent to new business entrants. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 6:49 am
What’s truly interesting from a trademark counsel standpoint is that, while Facebook filed these oppositions, they only cover seven of Designbook’s applications. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:25 am
"Judge Walsh found this approach to be a logical extension of Universal Overall to cover both use-based applications and ITU applications, as long as correction is made prior to registration or any challenge to the pending application.TTABlog comment: The Universal Overall case is not one in which an applicant listed five goods but had actually used the mark on less than five. [read post]
