Search for: "New v. New" Results 6541 - 6560 of 166,049
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2009, 5:16 pm
Mason U. law school web site:Despite the fact that the Supreme Court's 5-4 vote in Kelo v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 3:03 am by Lyle Denniston
In issuing the new regulations, the government agencies said they were responding to the Supreme Court’s summary order last year in Wheaton College v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 3:07 am by Jamie Abrams
Cohen, Greer Donley and Rachel Rebouché have posted a Guest Essay in the New York Times Opinion Section titled Joe Biden Can’t Save Roe v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 7:48 am
In reviewing the news for bloggable material we come across some strange stuff, but this is pretty unusual. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 2:19 pm by Amy Howe
The justices added three new cases to their merits docket: United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:52 am by Walter Olson
The plight of a Pennsylvania property owner faced with an onerous new ordinance on private graveyards gives the Supreme Court a chance to revisit and revise a 30-year-old decision that requires the targets of takings to go through state court litigation first before suing in federal court for compensation [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Meggan DeWitt on Cato merits amicus in Knick v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
The US Supreme Court today took up three criminal cases for decision next term.Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:27 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of the Interior (Oil and Gas Drilling Permits)United States of America v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Using new archival sources, this article reinvestigates this case, its trajectory and its meaning as a legal precedent. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 9:05 am
Douglas Floyd's latest article, Three Faces of Supplemental Jurisdiction After the Demise of United Mine Workers v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 4:44 am
Scotus Blog reports that the Supreme Court did not accept to hear the case of Forbes v. [read post]