Search for: "State v. David"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 14,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
"Katfriends and IP enthusiasts David Pellisé and Juan Carlos Quero (Pellisé Abogados, Barcelona) have recently been involved in some successful litigation in Spain which may not seem to exciting to those non-Spaniards who are unaware of how deeply entrenched are the national legal traditions of that country and how difficult it is to achieve a paradigm shift in the way IP is litigated (a case in point being the persistent reluctance of the Spanish courts to align… [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 12:39 pm
DavisStatutory speedy trial violationFailure to give lesser included offense instructionProsecutorial misconductImproper statements from state witnessesJanuary 30--Friday--a.m.State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
(David Zalubowski/AP) Ilya, Jonathan, Randy and I are skeptical about the Nebraska & Oklahoma v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am
The decision cites to Judge Friedman's ruling in the DeBoer case as well as the seminal case on federal benefits: United States v Windsor. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:03 am
Mary v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
Meanwhile, on the PatLit blog, David Berry reports on yet another patent case that the US Supreme Court is happy to hear, Kimble v Marvel Enterprises, which will revisit the rule in Brulotte v Thys and the endearing practice of extracting royalty payments from a licensee after the patent has expired (this patent involves a Spiderman toy, if you were wondering). [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm
Unlike Lucy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The Forensics of Verbal Fillers Broadly stated, speakers tend to use the verbal fillers uh and um when something has interrupted the enormously complicated task of speech production. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:11 am
Davis v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
See David Kaye & David Freedman, “Reference Guide on Statistics,” in F.J.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
“The time for lighting the Chanukah candles is from sunset until the time that the traffic ceases in the marketplace,” states the Talmud (Shabbos 21b). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
Magistrate Judge David G. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
It applied a test drawn from the concurring opinion of Justice David Souter in the 2009 case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm
Following the Upper Tribunal judgment in SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) [our report], the DWP has issued a Circular - HB U6/2014 The thing is that it isn't quite right, in some quite important ways. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process claims. [read post]
