Search for: "State v. David."
Results 6541 - 6560
of 14,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
(David Zalubowski/AP) Ilya, Jonathan, Randy and I are skeptical about the Nebraska & Oklahoma v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 10:42 am
The decision cites to Judge Friedman's ruling in the DeBoer case as well as the seminal case on federal benefits: United States v Windsor. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 4:03 am
Mary v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 1:33 am
Meanwhile, on the PatLit blog, David Berry reports on yet another patent case that the US Supreme Court is happy to hear, Kimble v Marvel Enterprises, which will revisit the rule in Brulotte v Thys and the endearing practice of extracting royalty payments from a licensee after the patent has expired (this patent involves a Spiderman toy, if you were wondering). [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:27 pm
Unlike Lucy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:18 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The Forensics of Verbal Fillers Broadly stated, speakers tend to use the verbal fillers uh and um when something has interrupted the enormously complicated task of speech production. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 4:11 am
Davis v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 12:38 pm
See David Kaye & David Freedman, “Reference Guide on Statistics,” in F.J.C. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:54 am
“The time for lighting the Chanukah candles is from sunset until the time that the traffic ceases in the marketplace,” states the Talmud (Shabbos 21b). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
Magistrate Judge David G. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
It applied a test drawn from the concurring opinion of Justice David Souter in the 2009 case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm
Following the Upper Tribunal judgment in SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council, SSWP v James Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) [our report], the DWP has issued a Circular - HB U6/2014 The thing is that it isn't quite right, in some quite important ways. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Regrettably, the scam phenomenon is not exclusive to trade marks and designs, explains David in this post, after receiving a message from the mysterious “European Patent Organization”.* Hurray for judicial sense on product by process claims- Birss triumphs in Hospira v GenentechThis note from Darren is about Hospira v Genentech [on which see the IPKat note here], a pharma-patent case that Mr Justice Birss has decided in light of product-by-process claims. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
The court’s decision in Bush v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
By V. [read post]
