Search for: "State v. Word" Results 6541 - 6560 of 40,660
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2021, 6:50 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The offer was "reasonably susceptible to more than one interpretation because the word 'collectively' contradicts the use of the word 'each.'" The Court concludes, "An offer that states a dollar amount to be specified in the judgment but does so using language that would permit the defendant to argue later that the offer was for a different amount has no Rule 68 validity. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
United States decision—the first use of the word in a Supreme Court opinion. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
” Another example is the Appellate Division’s 2013 decision in Mizrahi v Cohen where, stating that “in certain circumstances, a buyout may be an appropriate equitable remedy upon the dissolution of an LLC,” the court granted the petitioning 50% member’s request to compel the other 50% member to sell his interest to the petitioner at a judicially determined value. [read post]
” In arguing that the physical loss trigger to coverage had not been met, State Farm relied on the 2001 Illinois Supreme Court’s opinion in Travelers Insurance Co. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 10:49 am by Eugene Volokh
" Almost every word in that sentence is false—and in this context—malicious. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 9:41 am by Florian Mueller
"The wording doesn't make it 100% certain that the pursuit of, or a threat with, an ASI renders an implementer an unwilling licensee. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 7:58 am by Giles Peaker
If works do not fall within this paragraph, then they may fall within paragraph (ii) if the conditions stated in that paragraph are satisfied. [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 4:04 am by SHG
But in an odd California case, Karton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 4:10 am by David Oxenford
The United States Supreme Court yesterday released its decision upholding the FCC’s 2017 changes to its ownership rules in the FCC v Prometheus Radio Project case (see our summary here). [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:44 am by Mayela Celis
  Please note that US courts often use the terms “ameliorative measures” and “undertakings” interchangeably (as stated in the petition).This petition has been docketed as Golan v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:27 pm by David Kopel
Wyoming Law) and I examine the decision in a new article, Errors of Omission: Words Missing from the Ninth Circuit's Young v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:56 pm by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
” See Op. at p. 33.Judge Ignelzi adopted Lackawanna County Local Rule of Civil Procedure 4007.1(a), that states that counsel making an objection at a deposition shall state the word “objection,” and briefly state the legal basis for the objection without argument. [read post]