Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 10,394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2018, 3:15 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission, about whether that agency’s administrative law judges are “officers” of the United States under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
3 May 2016, 1:42 am
Dialogue, 27 U.S. 1 (1829) United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Scalia’s opinion in D.C. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 12:48 pm
After reconsideration of the issue, it is now the position of the United States that the amended Section 5000A is constitutional. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
”) (alteration marks, quotation marks, and citation omitted). [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
The Article ends with a preliminary consideration of the consequences of this movement for domestic CSR in the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
That is true for the antebellum United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
That is true for the antebellum United States. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 12:15 pm
Corruption swirled around the highest levels of the United States and of China. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:03 pm
As soon as the Prosecutor issued the indictment, the United States House Committee on International Relations sent a letter to Secretary of State Colin Powell asking the Department of State to closely monitor the Prosecutor’s indictment of Gotovina. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
, (IPRoo), WIPO Director General candidates’ presentations to members: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP rights arise in UN debate on the right to participate in cultural life: (Intellectual Property Watch), IP academies agree to galvanise efforts to promote IP education: (WIPO), What business people do to maximise protection of IP: (Ezine @rticles), Lorin Brennan’s memo on interaction between UNICITRAL guide and IP rights: (IP finance), Kent’s… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:24 am
Affinity appealed to thiscourt and the Director of the United States Patent andTrademark Office (Director) intervened. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 6:19 am
This position echoes the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) stance in Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm
Ron Wyden and Mark Udall have been saying this for a long time. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
The commission rejected it and opted for the electric chair.For nearly a hundred years after New York’s decision, no state in the United States authorized lethal injection. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 6:16 am
At some point A.J. gave Kays two hickeys, prompting an online thread between the two about Kays buying cosmetics to hide the marks on his neck.Kays v. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:34 am
United States v. [read post]
