Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 42,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
”* Substantial evidence was described by the court as "such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 7:32 am
But the possibility that this delay may have prejudiced the ability of the Union to defend the Grievant in this matter cannot be overlooked. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 5:06 am
Carriers did not close their wallets when network neutrality rules were in force. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:17 am
Trial evidence supported the factors mitigating against greater parenting time, and the trial court’s findings with respect to parenting time were not against the great weight of the evidence. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm
No matter what you state as the reason for your Appeal, you will be granted a Referee Hearing if you file your Appeal in a timely fashion. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 11:51 am
Staples moved for judgment as a matter of law, arguing again that the asserted claims of the ’709 patent were invalid for indefiniteness and that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdicts of infringement as to the other two patents. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 11:35 am
This is why strict liability rules were invented -- to make the burden of proof for plaintiffs easier in cases where marshaling the evidence would be very difficult. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 3:17 am
" The court ruled that the Board did not err in considering the explanatory text appearing on applicant's specimens of use (see below) in determining the issue of descriptiveness. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 6:06 am
Claimant appealed the Board's ruling. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 6:06 am
Claimant appealed the Board's ruling. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 9:10 am
In Alabama, misdemeanors will be determined by the judge based on the presentation of evidence. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 12:00 pm
FRITSCHI.Finally, there was a review of the Finnish Supreme Court’s decision about the prerequisites for measures for preserving evidence under the Finnish Act on Preserving Evidence in Industrial Property Rights and Copyright Matters (the “APE”) and the applicant’s right to access the evidence that has been preserved pursuant to the APE.PATENTLYO has a number of blog posts this week. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:17 am
This is a court that has a specific set of rules and requires a correct amount of evidence to process a case. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm
While the Court may have repeatedly suggested that broad categorical rules may be inpermissible, it has nowhere suggested that subject matter arguments lack merit as a class, or that subject matter arguments must fail as a matter of course. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 7:06 am
However, such a per se equitable rule was inapplicable in this context, as the defendant must prove the amount of attorneys’ fees at stake by a preponderance of the evidence, and the court cannot relieve the defendant of its evidentiary burden by adopting a per se rule for one element of the amount at stake in the underlying litigation. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
The OFCCP’s definition of “similarly situated” for the purposes of evaluating compensation differences in its new sex discrimination regulations is so broad that it provides little guidance for federal contractors and goes beyond Title VII standards, two attorneys who handle OFCCP compliance matters recently told Employment Law Daily. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm
The CCA’s Chapter 64 rulings on DNA were worse. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
The first rule of grand jury is that you don’t talk about grand jury. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
Suppress Evidence (`Def.'s Mot. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Minora affirmed the decision of the Lackawanna County special trial master for discovery in a motor vehicle accident litigation that allowed a plaintiff to gather discovery on the finances earned and prior litigation involvement of a defense independent medical examiner dating back three years.In so ruling, Minora followed the standard set forth in Cooper and Feldman and set forth the painstakingly detailed evidence that plaintiffs counsel provided to the court to establish that… [read post]
