Search for: "Voter v. Voter"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 6,772
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2007, 5:53 pm
The case, Porter v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 1:55 am
Answers that say "I wouldn't do so unilaterally because I believe in the Article V mechanism" will be disqualified for fighting the hypo. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:48 pm
For example, overturning Griswold v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 9:31 pm
Washington State Grange v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 1:25 pm
On July 13, 2007, New York County Lawyers' Association (NYCLA) filed its amicus curiae brief with the United States Supreme Court in the matter of New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:03 pm
Posner's analysis of the political economy of such regulations, however, is unpersuasive, and seems to be driven by an unfortunate projection of Posnerian intuitions onto the mind of the median Chicago voter. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:42 am
And it was the War on Drugs that led to the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 8:46 am
Might I suggest that sometimes a V-neck top is only a V-neck top? [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
The ruling in State of Ohio v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 11:41 am
In Arias v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
That happened in Ohio, where voters ratified a constitutional amendment that is similar in idea but worded differently. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 3:28 pm
The 11th Circuit released its opinion in Thompson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 1:00 pm
Voters who do so can then vote by regular ballot, unless challenged. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:24 am
Indiana's cert petition in Crawford v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 7:45 am
This is a really interesting paper, and I recommend a download if you are interested in median voter theories. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 11:17 am
In Horton v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 10:24 am
In Horton v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 7:11 am
Other acts of constitutional hardball, like the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 5:51 am
Seastrom v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 10:20 am
The board claimed he needed a majority of all eligible voters. [read post]
