Search for: "AC v. State" Results 641 - 660 of 1,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2020, 2:44 am by INFORRM
  This is the first successful legal challenge to AFR technology and an important decision in relation to the regulation of state surveillance. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:51 pm by Editorial Board
 On August 24,  two summonses with notice were filed in New York state court against DB Structured Products, Inc. [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:13 am by Gene Quinn
Since the United States Supreme Court first addressed the patentability of computer software in Gottschalk v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 4:11 am by Rosalind English
The ruling on Tony Bland is now nearly twenty years old (Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789) and there the patient was in a permanent vegetative state after being crushed at the 1989 Hillsborough stadium disaster. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 3:05 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd (Formerly known as Ace Bermuda Insurance Ltd), heard 12-13 November 2019. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by CMS
Twenty years later, in Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] 2 AC 1, the Court of Appeal purportedly (in the words of the Supreme Court yesterday) followed the Prudential decision, reiterating the Foss v Harbottle rule and holding that a shareholder cannot sue for the recovery of a diminution in the value of his shares or in distributions, where that loss flows from loss suffered by the company and that company has a cause of action to recover… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 9:32 am by John J Downes
It applied the principles laid down by the House of Lords in the case of Tomlinson v Congleton DC [2004] AC 46 in interpreting the 1957 Act. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:20 am by ELLIOT GOLD, SERGEANTS' INN CHAMBERS
It has been just over ten years since the major decision of R (Laporte) v CC Gloucestershire [2006] UKHL 55; [2007] 2 AC 105, which considered what could amount to a breach of the peace. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
To punish such a parent by requiring higher child support ... is neither good law nor good policy” (Abouhalkah v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:42 am by Howard Knopf
As to what is “fair dealing”, the law was clearly stated by the Supreme Court of Canada in CCH v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am by Adam Wagner
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am by INFORRM
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]