Search for: "Black v. U.s.*" Results 641 - 660 of 889
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:09 am by Edwin Komen and Chidera Anyanwu
Clay Realtors Angel Fire, 416 F.3d 1195 (10th Cir. 2005), abrogated in part by Muchnick, 559 U.S. 154; Positive Black Talk Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:09 am by Edwin Komen and Chidera Anyanwu
Clay Realtors Angel Fire, 416 F.3d 1195 (10th Cir. 2005), abrogated in part by Muchnick, 559 U.S. 154; Positive Black Talk Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
This is often cheaper than buying additional electricity from power plants and reduces the risk of black-, brown-, and taupe-outs. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:12 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
” 11We believe the civil union law created a burdensome and flawedstatutory scheme that fails to afford same-sex couples the samerights and remedies provided to heterosexual married couples asrequired … by the New Jersey Supreme Court and its landmarkLewis v. [read post]