Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm
The practical effect of the decision was substantially because many US States, particularly California and New York, still apply, at least arguably, a per se standard to resale price maintenance agreements. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 1:57 pm
In Carrera v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
V. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 3:01 pm
(May 15, 2013) [2] Fraley v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:36 am
John Fund v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
We do not see any other companies approaching the challenge in the same way we are, but a few companies in and around our space include: Intapp Pricing, BigHand Matter Pricing, and Virtual Pricing Director. [read post]
17 May 2014, 1:14 pm
There is a lot here -- and it covers a very common situation related to commercial suits.Here's the story: I purchase a product of an online company which I believe to be based in California. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
AIM Immunotech Inc., Politan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
AIM Immunotech Inc., Politan v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
In FTC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:57 pm
Drip pricing (adding fees after initial disclosure) is an area of significant interest: StubHub, TicketMaster, car rental companies that charge “environmental” fees. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 5:43 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 11:55 am
Trademarks * The California Supreme Court denied review in Ison v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 10:40 am
In DZ Reserve v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm
Those aren't California-based, which is where most of the venture capital action in the U.S. is (Sand Hill Road). [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 4:03 pm
Bell (07-8521), on whether a poor individual on death row who has a federally funded defense lawyer may use that lawyer’s aid in seeking clemency from a state’s governor, and Pacific Bell v. linkLine Communications (07-512), on the validity of the antitrust theory of a “price squeeze” — that is, a company policy of setting high prices at wholeale but then low prices on its own retail sales to undercut… [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am
At least some lower California courts have agreed, but in Martinez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:59 am
(TR Legal, Westlaw Pricing Guide For Private Price Plans (Apr. 2010)). * * * Suppose you are a California attorney. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
By itself, off-label promotion is no more causal than, as we commented the other day, a “video of a company employee kicking his dog. [read post]
