Search for: "Howells v. Howells" Results 641 - 660 of 705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2025, 11:43 am by Andrew Weissmann
Just last year, the far right was deploring the Biden administration’s efforts to bludgeon private sector actors into curtailing their actions and speech—that resulted in a Supreme court decision in Murthy v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am by Eugene Volokh
Bailey, 644 N.E.2d 314 (Ohio 1994) (holding that lying to a police officer in order to interfere with the officer’s attempt to apprehend defendant’s brother was obstruction of justice); Howell v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),EU CORDIS launches a new web service for joint research initiatives: (IPR Helpdesk),EC announces plan to create single, EU-wide market for online music, films, and video games: (Ars Technica)GermanyGermans shun patents, but press for patent valuation ISO: (IPKat)Hong KongCreative commons Hong Kong begins public discussion (Creativecommons.com)IndiaBlawging our way to the front pages of Business Standard: (Spicy IP),Bootleg baloney: It's music to… [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Justice Department opposed the unsealing, prompting Howell’s decision. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v… [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 4:40 pm by Tiana Garbett and James Gatto
Howell affirmed, “[i]n the absence of any human involvement in the creation of the work, the clear and straightforward answer is the one given by the Register: No. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
App’x 708 (10th Cir. 2013) (joined opinion) Defendant not entitled to federal habeas relief and did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel Howell v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Other Pryor decisions with separate opinions include Howell v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Zappala's statement more than 15 years ago in the case of Howell v. [read post]