Search for: "In re: Smith" Results 641 - 660 of 9,563
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2009, 9:53 am
Don't sleep around with opportunistic partners and regret it later just because you're lonely. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 11:16 am by Tom Smith
But at least they're not interested in "marriage" as a topic either. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 1:52 pm
Smith) get locked up for 15-plus years, with no end particularly in sight. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:00 am
  Now, I want to respond to Wesley Smith's responses to my "Eight Reasons that Might Justify Unilateral Refusal of Treatment. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 2:07 pm by Tom Smith
I mean, you march a giant company in the WH and say, you're handing over 20 very large and they say, OK! [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:18 pm by Tom Smith
Old Volvos make practical cars; uncomfortable shoes are stupid; Birkenstocks with nubby socks are very comfy if you can get used to them; I used to smoke a pipe; they're heavenly but make your mouth reek and give you cancer; rooms cluttered with books are inviting; tenure is worth a lot; the life of ideas is rewarding; tolerance is a good thing; a well done graduation ceremony is touching. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 3:36 pm by John Enser
 This blogger welcomes the idea in theory, but has reservations about whether, in a world where the EU copyright consultation received 9500 responses, such a review is possible within a realistic timeframe and before changes in Brussels will lead to the need for such a committee to re-commence proverbially painting the Forth BridgeThe event's chair, Professor Johanna Gibson of Queen Mary, University of London, who holds the Herchel Smith chair in IP law, promised that the… [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 6:54 am
Smith: “Karl Rove wasn’t involved? [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:00 pm by bteam
By Walker Smith On Tuesday I participated in a webcast from the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 12:26 pm by Tom Smith
Lis Smith, the communications advisor to Pete Buttigieg, tweeted: “The story of the 2020 Democratic primary shouldn’t be how individual candidates used debates to deep-six rivals and push litmus test policies they’re gonna disavow once they get a poll back. [read post]