Search for: "In re S.W." Results 641 - 660 of 1,039
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2015, 12:23 pm by Jeff Welty
Hodges, 695 S.W.2d 171 (Tenn. 1985) (a defendant claimed that his religious beliefs required him to dress like a chicken when attending court; a trial judge held him in contempt; the reviewing court noted that courts should balance litigants’ free exercise rights against the need to preserve order in the courtroom; it remanded the case for further findings regarding the sincerity of the defendant’s beliefs, suggesting that they may not have been sincere, “particularly if… [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:32 am by Beth Graham
  In his opposition to Watch House International’s motion, Nelson claimed: (1) he did not fall within the Plan’s definition of “employee,” because he did not sign the Plan and the Plan defines “employee” as “the individual whose signature is affixed hereto;” and (2) the Plan was unenforceable because it was illusory under, inter alia, In re Halliburton Co., 80 S.W.3d 566 (Tex. 2002), and Lizalde v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 4:07 am
In accordance with the views of the Real Property, Probate & Trust Law Section of The Florida Bar as amicus curiae, we hold that the answer is yes.The Court then drops this footnote:The Court expresses its appreciation to the Section for submission of its amicus brief.You're not kidding -- way to farm out the hard stuff! [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:39 pm by theadm
The court also turned back the employer’s reliance on In re Halliburton Co., 80 S.W.3d 566 (Tex. 2002), a case in which the Texas Supreme Court enforced an arbitration agreement that was not signed by either the employee or the employer. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 7:01 am by Leiza Dolghih
” Additionally, come September, Texas courts will have to apply a balancing test first articulated in  In re M-I, L.L.C., 505 S.W.3d 569 (Tex. 2016) when determining whether a party involved in a trade secrets lawsuit can be denied access to documents or testimony about its competitor’s trade secrets. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 9:06 am
Pool, 941 S.W.2d 910 (Tex. 1997), in stating the standard for summary judgment evidence regarding issues related to adverse possession.Both Ernest Cannon and Moncrief Minerals Partnership held undivided mineral interests in a lease which, at the time this suit was filed, was operated by Sun-Key. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:30 am by Tim Zinnecker
Green, 883 S.W.2d 415, 425 (Tex. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
Municipal Law: Historical Rehabilitation PaymentsEquitable Trust Company v. 604-1st Street S.W. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:30 pm by D. Todd Smith
In In re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 10:30 pm by D. Todd Smith
In In re Columbia Medical Center of Las Colinas, Subsidiary, L.P. [read post]