Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 641 - 660 of 5,931
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 3:14 pm by David Oxenford
  This week's action merely deletes the 53 rules that remained in Part 1, where the entire text of the deleted rule was to refer the reader to the corresponding rule section in Part 73, where the substantive rules still reside and are still fully enforced (including matters such as the FCC's EEO rule). [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 2:18 am by Jelle Hoekstra
In the Board's view, the "gold" standard for the assessment of Articles 123(2) and 76(1) EPC requires that the subject-matter of an amended claim (or of a claim of a divisional application) be based only on what the skilled person would directly and unambiguously derive from the application as originally filed (or from the earlier application; see G 2/10). [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
 [4]      While none of these cases has proceeded to trial, rulings at the motion to dismiss and judgment on the pleadings stage in two of these matters, all within the Central District of California, have emerged with contradictory results -- including one ruling in August to the effect that the business judgment rule doesn’t apply to non-director officers. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
NLRB Law Memo 10/09/2006 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Board shall, however, in the following consider these alternative formulations as like numbered auxiliary requests - i.e. auxiliary requests I to IV - each directed at a correspondingly amended claim 1. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the claims as amended, claims 22 to 29 were directed at a dialysis machine comprising a user interface.The opponent pointed out that this amendment violated A 123(3).It also requested the Board to refer the following questions to the Enlarged Board (EBA):1. [read post]
11 May 2021, 8:54 am by Roel van Woudenberg
With a further letter dated 10 November 2020, the patent proprietor clarified its requests and submitted sets of claims G-J and G'-I'.XIII. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am by Eugene Volokh
Oregon (1972), the Supreme Court held that the Sixth Amendment requires unanimity for a verdict — but that the Fourteenth Amendment does not carry this rule over to the states, and that even 9–3 verdicts are constitutionally permissible. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 3:43 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Get Moving To Update HIPAA Compliance For New Omnibus Rule Requirements As Amended By Technical Corrections Covered entities and their business associates have a lot to accomplish between now and September to update their business associates and comply with other changes made by the Omnibus Rule by its September 2013 deadline. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is indeed true and legitimate that as a rule, a petition under A 112a is filed with the objective of obtaining that the decision taken by the Board of appeal be amended with regards to content in favour of the petitioner. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 6:24 pm by Francis Pileggi
  Consistent with the recent amendments to the FRCP, the Court of Chancery recently amended Rules 1, 26, 34 and 37–effective on July 1. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 2:09 am by David Pocklington
Faculty Jurisdiction (Amendment) Rules 2023 (1) (GS 2310) Faculty Jurisdiction (Am) Rules – Explanatory Notes (1) (GS 2310X) [1] The procedural stages of legislation – first consideration; revision; final drafting and final approval – are described here and in diagrammatic form here. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 1:00 am
The candidate also argued that his own alternative amendment to claim 1, contrary to the opinion of the Examiner's Report, established inventive step over the prior art.The candidate did not amend claim 1 to include the epoxy resin cover. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 6:00 am by Jeffrey Bellin
What to look for at argument There are two things to look for in the upcoming argument. (1) How broadly is the court inclined to rule? [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 4:13 pm
On Friday of last week the UK-IPO issued a new Practice Amendment Notice, PAN 1/08. [read post]