Search for: "Lord v. Lord" Results 641 - 660 of 5,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2007, 2:48 am
Both sides filed their objections to the presentence report (PSR) in the prosecution of Lord Conrad Black and three other former Hollinger International executives -- Peter Atkinson, John Boultbee, and Mark Kipnis -- mail fraud charges in connection with non-compete... [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 1:29 am
Lord Carloway agreed with Lord Tyre and his reasoning. and held on that basis Lord Tyre was correct to find that no prima facie case existed. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
Lord Rodger agreed with Lord Hope, Lord Scott and Lord Brown. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 7:56 am by christopher
[thanks to quick study memo from Lock Lorde] Fleischer Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 10:09 am
The House of Lords will be giving judgment in Glasgow CC v Mitchell on Wednesday 18 Feb 09 (link is to a .pdf). [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:15 am
R (on the application of National Grid Gas plc (formerly Transco plc)) (Appellants) v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
On 29 October 2018 Lord Speaker Lord Fowler issued a statement on parliamentary privilege. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 3:30 am by Emma Cave
Emma Cave In Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority (1986) the UK House of Lords held that minors under the age of 16 could access contraceptive advice and treatment in their own right provided they satisfied a test which became known as “Gillick competence. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
A panel made up of Lord Reed, Lady Arden and Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows will decide whether, following the decision in Merricks v MasterCard [2020] UKSC 51, the winds of group litigation continue to blow in a pro-consumer direction. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 10:04 am
In re E (a child) (AP) (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2008] UKHL 66 (12 November 2008) Zalewska (AP) (Appellant) v Department for Social Development (Respondents) (Northern Ireland) [2008] UKHL 67 (12 November 2008) Source: www.parliament.uk        [read post]
27 Oct 2024, 12:36 am by Frank Cranmer
Lords Spiritual (Women) Act (Extension) Bill The Lords Spiritual (Women) Act (Extension) Bill completed its House of Lords stages on 22 October and was read the first time in the House of Commons and ordered to be printed on 23 October. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:08 am
The Supreme Court has published its decision in the case of AXA General Insurance Limited and others v The Lord Advocate and Others [2011] UKSC 46 in which AXA and other insurers (the Insurers) appealed against the decision of the Inner House of the Court of Session regarding the legality of the Damages (Asbestos-Related Conditions) (Scotland) Act 2009 (the 2009 Act) (please see our previous blog here for further information on that decision).The 2009 Act was passed to reverse the… [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:07 am by INFORRM
  This was the position, for example, in the case of In re Pritchard ([1963] Ch. 502) where, having been outvoted 2:1 on what he regarded as an empty technicality Lord Denning made the memorable complaint “Quite recently in Pontin v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am by Mike
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 11:25 am by Mike
House disguised as a Barn In Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2011] UKSC 15 Lord Hope describe the actions of Mr Beesely thus: "Frankly, the dishonesty involved in this case is so far removed from almost anything else that I have ever encountered in this area of the law that it appears to constitute a category all of its own. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:57 am by Julie O'Neill and Adam Fleisher
In neither case, according to the FTC, was Lord & Taylor’s role in the promotional effort appropriately disclosed. [read post]