Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 641 - 660
of 14,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2019, 2:54 am
" The Board didn't buy it. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 7:11 pm
Mark points out that the risks of blogging for a big firm lawyer aren't worth it when compared to the "awfully intangible benefits. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
Further factual development was required.Dilution: Defendants correctly pointed out that the marks aren’t famous. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
Virag argued that Rogersdidn’t apply because the Virag mark didn’t have enough cultural significance to be an integral part of our vocabulary, like Barbie. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:24 am
The PTO is supposed to look at the specimen to make sure it shows use as a mark/to see issues that couldn’t have been resolved without a specimen … like whether the specimen shows the mark at all. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm
What you had was this campaign of misinformation which, frankly, caused the reaction that you saw.This isn’t the first time we’ve heard this talking point, and it probably won’t be the last. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 4:40 am
Esper recalls Trump saying in June 2020, inside the Oval Office: “Can’t you just shoot them? [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:15 pm
Don’t count on donuts, frozen pizza, coffee creamers, or canned cinnamon rolls to go on tasting the same — and don’t count on the federal government to respect your choices in the matter [Peter Suderman, earlier] And of course it was public health advocates and the federal government who helped push foodmakers into the use of trans fats in the first place. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 2:39 pm
A hint in the page reads: “the distribution doesn’t matter”— clueing the solver into the idea that the order of the braille spaces within the art doesn’t hold the solution. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 9:48 am
The subject matter of protection is the word as such. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:43 am
July 8, 2009Re: The Vast Amount That We Don’t Know About The Madoff Matter. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm
The case seemed to indicate that the UK courts may be just as willing as the EPO to enforce a hard-line against added matter in patents.Rose Hughes also discussed the EPO Board of Appeal decision in T 0258/21, which dealt with reliance on a post-hoc identified technical effect of medical use in the absence of any data in the patent application. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:07 am
In the first place, there has been a good deal of trade mark "creep": subject matter such as colours, smells, packaging, product shapes, sounds, motion marks and positional marks which didn't originally attract attention in many jurisdictions, now do so. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
[T]he court cannot neutrally apply principles of corporate bylaw interpretation without intruding upon the archbishop's religious decision-making authority. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
And in the event of noncompliance, the matter could be restored by way of motion or stipulation.When no payment was made, and the landlord later sought to restore the case, the New York County Civil Court denied the request because it thought that restoration needed to await the conclusion of the matrimonial matter. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
It’s not the overlap that matters. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
The Supreme Court held in 1918 that “there is no such thing as property in a trade-mark except as a right appurtenant to an established business or trade in connection with which the mark is employed … [T]he right to a particular mark grows out of its use, not its mere adoption. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
Back in December 2006 [that's right, this matter started with a trade mark application filed nearly nine years ago], the word mark BGW Bundesverband der deutschen Gesundheitswirtschaft (the 'long mark') was registered in Germany for various goods and services in Classes 16, 35, 41 and 43. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 12:00 am
Although IP lawyers may avoid tax law matters, some just can't be avoided. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 10:34 am
Mark Brennan, UNESCO Chair) Mark A. [read post]
