Search for: "Matter of Martin B."
Results 641 - 660
of 920
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 7:01 am
Cash on hand or in checking or savings accounts; b. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada summarized the applicable principle (from the 1990 decision in MacDonald Estate v Martin) in its 2013 decision in CN Railway v McKercher as follows: A lawyer cannot act in a matter where he may use confidential information obtained from a former or current client to the detriment of that client. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Martin, [1990] 3 SCR 1235. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:32 am
As Wikipedia also notes, if Party A Serves a discovery request on Party B and Party B either objects to the request or doesn’t comply, Party A can “seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm
§ 507(b). [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 5:25 am
Ayer Chair in Business Law and Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:00 pm
Susan B. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Contra Shugerman, it does not matter if Congress authorized ad [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:42 pm
” Dan B. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am
The two new relists this week involve very disparate subject matter. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Zywicki & Anthony B. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:46 am
Andrew Arden QC Arden Chambers Housing Law Practitioners Association Justin Bates, Vice-chair executive committee Yinka Adedeji 1 Pump Court Chambers James B. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Zywicki & Anthony B. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
AUTHOR Martin, Peter, 1940- TITLE Samuel Johnson : a biography / Peter Martin. [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 7:40 pm
So it doesn't much matter how lousy the responses were: your remedy for lousy answers is barred by the discovery motion cut-off. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
And the contract are offered as “take-em-or-leave-em” to customers who must, in the case of AT&T, either: A) try to live in 2011 without a cell phone, or B) try to find a cellular carrier without such a provision (good luck with either, especially post-Concepcion). [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
We note below where further information would be helpful before reaching any firm conclusion on a matter. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
B. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 12:31 pm
The Court of Appeals disagreed, reasoning that the Weather Report was not a document of indisputable accuracy for purposes of Rule 201(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence because it did not state the level of rain that was occurring at the time of the crash. [read post]
