Search for: "New York v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
In what I’ve dubbed the Airport Cases, judges in New York, Virginia, Washington, Massachusetts, and elsewhere promptly ordered their release. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
I have the privilege to present to the Court the eighty-third Attorney General of the United States, the Honorable Loretta Lynch of New York. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:52 am
Mesa, which “asks whether there is a remedy for a Mexican citizen killed when a Border Patrol agent in the United States opens fire on someone in Mexico,” and Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:24 am
I’ll be on the panel along with Associate Justice David Friedman of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department; Vice Chancellor Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery; Delaware attorney Kurt Heyman of Proctor Heyman LLP; and New York attorney Jeffrey Eilender of Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 8:46 am
Sotomayor later left the contiguous United States for Puerto Rico, where she spoke to judges from eight Latin American countries on September 17 as part of a training program organized by the State Department’s Judicial Studies Institute. [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
” This was agreed to, and the next day eight Justices of the Supreme Court met and solemnly concurred that the Customs Department of the United States and the Circuit Court of the Southern District of New York and Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary didn’t know anything more about what sauce was than a tomtit did about the Pentateuch. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 4:11 pm
The Department of Justice is litigating a different position. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
Had that been the case, the New York State and United States legislatures would have added language providing for such exceptions. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
In 1995, the Supreme Court, New York County, had directed the Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
In 1995, the Supreme Court, New York County, had directed the Mr. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:04 am
 In January, for instance, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:38 am
In Mitchell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
The State Department stated that the reasons for barred entry include alleged acts of corruption and illicit campaign financing. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am
United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:43 am
After Sunday’s imposition of new restrictions on entry into the United States by nationals from eight countries, the Supreme Court yesterday removed the pending entry-ban cases from the October argument calendar and directed the parties to address the effect on the cases of both the new order and the scheduled October 24 expiration of the refugee provisions in the previous order. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
§ 922(g), which the court was holding for United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Yesterday the justices heard oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
